A Trip To The Woods Is Not As Cheap As It Used To Be
Wednesday, September 30th, 2009An Eagle Scout billed $25,000 for a rescue. He got lost while hiking in New Hampshire. The price of this rescue was much (much) more then the average of $203. I’m guessing this must have been a big rescue attempt for it to cost over 100 times more then the average.
As most of you know I enjoy hiking, so thats why this story caught my attention. It’s kinda fun to read what people think. One person said that we don’t charge for ambulance for drug addicts but we charge a 17 year old boy. Other people said that it was his choice to be out in the woods (and without a buddy!) and it was his choices that got him lost so why should tax payers be held responsible. And still another person asked that if they were going to be charged did the parents have a choice in how much to spend for the search and rescue? And if they did not find the boy would they have still charged?
I guess for me what I get from this is the importance to do ‘prep work’ for a hike. I know my last one I did a crappy job at (did have a great time and stayed on the trail but just went the wrong way!). In today’s world there is no reason not to have a good GPS with waypoints to your vehicle, camp, and anything else (another thing we did wrong last time, we had a GPS but did not mark where the car was, how dumb was that?). Also the importance of having a buddy at all times. You should never be out in the woods by your self. Never. If he had a friend with him he might have been like “Hey, the trail is over here” (or at very least the 25K would have been 12.5K for each!)
Okay, I guess when it comes down to it if I was out in the woods and got lost and a search and rescue was done and it cost 25K, I would understand when they send me a bill. I would not like it, but I would understand.
